Prediction of Gerard Campana Lee [404th] vs Stijn Slump [539th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W L W
Form
W L L W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Lee 2 - 0 Slump
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lee winning 4 and Slump winning 1. The last match between Lee and Slump was at the Montemar Challenger, 17-11-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gerard Campana Lee | 2 |
| Stijn Slump | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stijn Slump
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
42%
(
31 of
73)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-3 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stijn Slump
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
40 of
87)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 22 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:11:55 | Average Match Time | 2:11:55 |
| 66% (121/182) | 1st Serve % | 44% (71/160) |
| 68% (82/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (49/71) |
| 48% (29/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (42/89) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 43% (69/160) | Return Points Win % | 39% (71/182) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gerard Campana Lee vs Stijn Slump Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lee 2 - 0 Slump
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lee has won 43.5% of points on their second serve, while Slump has won 45.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lee, in recent form, has won 52.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Slump has won 41.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.39% and 26.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lee has saved 49.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Slump has saved 52.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lee has won 51.79% of matches played (W/L 29/ 27), with Slump winning 60% (W/L 39/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 66/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Slump has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 99/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 23), where as Slump has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.81% of matches (W/L 35/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lee winning 2 times and Slump being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lee winning 4 and Slump winning 1. The last match between Lee and Slump was at the Montemar Challenger, 17-11-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lee and Slump have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lee winning 1 times and Slump 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lee winning 1, and Slump 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lee has played against opponents with an average rank of 223.54 while Slump has played against players with an average rank of 114.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lee has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Slump has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lee has converted 34.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Slump has converted 29.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
75 of
136)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
104)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
58 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(5) 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
108)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marlon Vankan
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Alvaro Peiro Serrano
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriel Ghetu
Player
Stijn Slump
75%
(
85 of
114)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Emilien Demanet
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Dali Blanch
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Stijn Slump
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Stijn Slump
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Yaroslav Demin
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Lee vs Slump?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lee Vs Slump is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (72/67) | Win/Loss | 59% (123/85) |
| 52% (170/156) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (275/196) |
| 51% (1596/1555) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2352/2021) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 264 | Aces Total | 515 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 478 | Total Double Faults | 417 |
| 1:47:17 | Average Match Time | 1:10:16 |
| 234.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 78.94 |
| 62% (5690/9244) | 1st Serve % | 55% (4988/9126) |
| 64% (3669/5690) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3488/4988) |
| 48% (1714/3554) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2143/4138) |
| 46% (436/939) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (416/957) |
| 42% (3762/8992) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3720/9233) |
| 52% (71/137) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (123/207) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (18/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (22/46) |
| 46% (22/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (26/54) |
| 78% (80/62) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (125/111) |
| 23% (80/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (125/14) |
| 17% (59/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (83/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
